Share:

CTH EE W HAMPTON over LINCOLN CREEK

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH EE W HAMPTON over LINCOLN CREEK
Structure number:P40053400000000
Location:0.2M E JCT STH 145
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:42.3 ft. [12.9 m]
Total length:113.2 ft. [34.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:21,371 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:59.3 tons [53.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:79.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$935,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201579.6Structurally deficientSeriousFairSatisfactory21371
June 201479.7Structurally deficientSeriousFairSatisfactory20850
June 201291.0Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory20850
June 201090.4Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory24900
April 200892.5Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory24900
April 200693.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory24900
March 200493.5Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory24900
August 200293.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory21900
November 200093.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood21900
January 199994.7Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodGood16700
July 199694.7Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory16700
October 199466.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodPoor16700
December 199283.1Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodFair16700
October 199083.1Not deficientSatisfactoryVery GoodFair16700