Share:

LRD SPRING COULEE over SPRING COULEE CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.60423, -91.17365
43°36'15" N, 91°10'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LRD SPRING COULEE over SPRING COULEE CREEK
Structure number:P62090400000000
Location:0.8M W JCT CTH K
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.3 ft. [6.2 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:70 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:16.2 tons [14.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:8.9 tons [8.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:35.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$130,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201535.8Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair70
May 201435.8Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryFair60
May 201245.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair60
May 201045.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair60
May 200852.3Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory60
May 200652.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood60
May 200452.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood60
March 200252.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood60
April 200056.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood60
April 199852.3Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60
July 199656.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60
March 199457.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60
July 199257.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60
October 199057.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60