Share:

CTH Z over BILLINGS CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.72395, -90.51707
43°43'26" N, 90°31'01" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH Z over BILLINGS CREEK
Structure number:P62090900000000
Location:1.4M N JCT CTH ZZ
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:29.2 ft. [8.9 m]
Total length:30.2 ft. [9.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.7 ft. [6.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Skew angle:18°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:86 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:12.5 tons [11.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:7.2 tons [6.5 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:39.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$159,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201539.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair86
September 201439.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorFair80
September 201249.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair80
September 201049.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair80
September 200849.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair80
September 200649.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair80
September 200449.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair80
September 200249.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair80
September 200056.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory80
August 199856.7Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory80
September 199656.7Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory80
May 199457.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good80
July 199257.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood80
November 199057.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood80