+43.61033, -90.70478
43°36'37" N, 90°42'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:P62093600000000
Location:1.5M N JCT STH 82
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Total length:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.7 ft. [6.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1933
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:520 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:79.0 tons [71.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:46.3 tons [42.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:34.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$197,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201534.8Structurally deficientFairFairSerious520
October 201434.9Structurally deficientFairFairSerious480
October 201265.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair480
October 201065.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair480
October 200865.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair480
October 200663.6Structurally deficientPoorFairFair480
October 200463.6Structurally deficientPoorFairFair480
October 200263.6Structurally deficientPoorFairFair480
October 200074.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory480
August 199874.6Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory480
October 199676.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory360
May 199476.7Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory360
November 199278.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory110
November 199078.9Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactorySatisfactory110