Share:

CTH DD over HONEY CREEK

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH DD over HONEY CREEK
Structure number:P64006900000000
Location:2.8M S JCT CTH D
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,404 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:21.3 tons [19.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:49.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$281,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201549.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory1404
August 201449.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory1300
August 201248.4Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory1300
August 201051.4Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory1300
August 200867.5Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory1300
August 200667.5Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory1300
November 200467.5Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory1300
November 200260.7Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory1300
May 200060.6Not deficientFairFairSatisfactory1300
July 199871.8Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory940
September 199671.8Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory940
June 199474.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good940
May 199274.2Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good940
July 199074.2Not deficientGoodVery GoodVery Good940