US ROUTE 19 over HACKERS CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.14527, -80.4291739°08'43" N, 80°25'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | US ROUTE 19 over HACKERS CREEK |
| Structure number: | 00000000017A071 |
| Location: | 0.19 MI SOUTH CO RT 19/20 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
| Total length: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1924 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,400 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 60.4 tons [54.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $850,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,600 [as of 1996] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 60.4 tons [54.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.8 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $428,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,200 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 19.8 tons [18.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 54.7 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $428,000 |