CR 5 over BIG BEAVER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.32844, -80.6650638°19'42" N, 80°39'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CR 5 over BIG BEAVER CREEK |
| Structure number: | 00000000034A012 |
| Location: | 0.03 MI W OF CR 94/1 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
| Total length: | 92.9 ft. [28.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 17.7 ft. [5.4 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1918 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 400 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 34.7 tons [31.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 15.8 tons [14.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 48.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,118,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 500 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 34.7 tons [31.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 15.8 tons [14.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 48.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,118,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 1988] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 32.7 tons [29.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 48.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $961,000 |