COUNTY ROUTE 42 over LITTLE TYGART CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.14009, -81.4794039°08'24" N, 81°28'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | COUNTY ROUTE 42 over LITTLE TYGART CREEK |
| Structure number: | 00000000054A092 |
| Location: | 0.02 M SOUTH OF CR 40/2 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
| Total length: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1976 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Channel beam [22] |
| Deck type: | Other [9] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 900 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 76.2 tons [69.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 41.6 tons [37.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 80.0 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $44,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 800 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 62.4 tons [56.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 80.0 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $44,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 550 [as of 1989] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 62.4 tons [56.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 39.6 tons [36.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 88.6 |