CR 6 over CLEAR FORK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.62397, -81.7075037°37'26" N, 81°42'27" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | CR 6 over CLEAR FORK |
| Structure number: | 00000000055A014 |
| Location: | 0.28 MI. W. OF CR 6/1 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Total length: | 106.0 ft. [32.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 13.5 ft. [4.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1917 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 820 [as of 2006] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 30.7 tons [27.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 5.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $900,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 850 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection has failed. River control devices have been destroyed. Stream bed aggradation, degradation or lateral movement has changed the channel to now threaten the bridge and/or approach roadway. [3] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 30.7 tons [27.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.9 tons [11.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 5.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $550,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 600 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 32.7 tons [29.7 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 14.9 tons [13.5 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 5.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $400,000 |